THE HUMAN COST OF COMMUTING

Kay Hall, SVP Global Advisory Services EMEA • July 31, 2019

Your home is in London. Your partner and children are there. You work at a London office. Your job, however, requires you to work two weeks each month in Toronto. You’re not an expat in Toronto, but neither are you a daily commuter, starting and ending every day at home. You’re stuck somewhere in the dreaded middle ground of international commuting and extended (and extensive) business tripping. So many of us have found ourselves in this situation and according to surveys the trend is on the rise.

Whether your employer initiated the commuting arrangement or whether you chose to avoid relocating your family, this arrangement is hard. Putting compliance issues aside, the toll on our physical and mental health is higher than we often realize. For this reason, many best practice organisations are starting to monitor this population more closely, and global mobility commuter policies generally cap long distance commuter arrangements to 6 months. According to Airinc’s 2019 Mobility Outlook Survey, commuter policies are the number one global mobility policy that companies want to develop right now. Why is there so much commuting, and why is it so problematic?

Why Commute At All?

Sometimes long-distance commuting makes sense. It’s possible that an employer wants to avoid the expense of an international relocation, but often it’s at the request of the employee for practical reasons, most often to avoid disruption to the family, such as the spouse’s career or the children’s education. This is ironic as in my view (and experience of both), commuting is the most disruptive to a family in the long run. Whereas a traditional international relocation is initially very stressful and a major upheaval for the entire family, once the dust settles, most assignees enjoy this unique life experience, which broadens our horizons and leaves lasting memories. Commuters on the other hand, are faced with minimal stress to begin with, but the stress gradually increases over time as all the travel and family separation takes its toll. The suitcase remains a permanent fixture in your home décor and worse of all, there is often no end in sight.

Effects on the Family Unity

So, what happens? When commuting extends too long, the traveling employee is often physically and mentally exhausted from time zone changes, long workdays and inadequate sleep. Through no-one’s fault, the daily chores are left to the at-home partner who must absorb the full load on top of a job and often parenting. This leaves both partners physically exhausted such that the little time they do spend together is difficult to enjoy.

Resentment can build up with one partner envying the commuter’s jet-setting lifestyle and abundance of alone time. The commuting parent, on the other hand, will miss seeing their children and playing an active role in their daily lives, feeling more and more like a visitor in their own home. The ‘at-home' lifestyle is viewed by the other as easy; after all, that parent doesn’t have to travel each week and live out of a suitcase. Communication inevitably suffers and two parallel lives start to emerge. There are few companies supporting their commuters with these personal challenges, but that could be hugely beneficial to employee wellbeing.

Socially, extended commuting arrangements also leave their mark. When free family time is so precious, there’s a tendency to protect it to the exclusion of friends and neighbors. During the working week, both partners are faced with a more subtle change of status, neither fitting in the couples nor the singles scene. Isolation can creep up on you and now you are well and truly on the slippery slope.

Looking to the Future

Thankfully many companies are aware of the human challenges of commuting and that lifestyle support from the employer benefits all parties; whereas until now compliance has been the main driver of commuter policies. Strategic Global mobility departments will often push back and advise the business when an assignment type is unsuitable. Our general awareness of the importance of mental health has helped pave the way. With the changing nature of the workforce, the growth of the gig economy and contractors, this will become ever more challenging for companies.

“While we have always supported short-term commuting arrangements as a necessary tool in facilitating international moves during term-time, for example, our experience shows that long-term commuting arrangements can place unacceptably high pressures on both the expat and their family.” -- Gill Gordon, HR director Schlumberger UK & chairman of Permits Foundation 


What is your organization doing to minimize the emotional, physical and social toll of commuting? 
Does your policy extend to contractors?

Share your stories below, your ideas and experiences are great to hear!
Or Share them with us via Twitter using #CostofCommuting




Share this post

April 1, 2025
Most mobile employees accept international relocations with mixed feelings that include excitement and curiosity. However, they’re often surprised when their move comes with more feelings of disorientation than they expected. Culture shock – the feelings of confusion, disconnectedness, and anxiety that people experience while integrating into a new culture – can make it difficult for mobile employees to transition into their new assignments effectively. It can also make it difficult for their accompanying families to settle into their new home, adding further stress to your employees’ relocation experiences. It all negatively impacts employees – but it has costly negative impacts for the organization, too.  Understanding the stages of culture shock can make dealing with it easier. Below, we take a look at each and offer suggestions your employees can use for navigating them. While supporting them on their journeys helps them to integrate into their new surroundings faster and with greater ease – it also benefits business productivity, organizational goals, and the company’s bottom line. Stages of Culture Shock & Suggestions for Dealing with Them
By Laurette Bennhold Samaan March 3, 2025
Between rising costs and limited budgets, it’s no surprise that many organizations turn to lump sum payments to control talent mobility spending. But is this approach effective – or can it actually end up costing companies more? In this blog post, we’ll discuss the unexpected costs associated with lump sum payment models, where they can go wrong, their impacts on the employee experience, and why managed moves benefit employees and organizations in the long run.  Perception vs. Reality: Lump Sum Payment Outcomes When organizations offer lump sum payments to their mobile employees, they're often being driven by a few assumptions. They believe that their mobile employees: Possess sufficient financial skills to manage their relocation budget Are savvy enough to procure the right relocation services/providers at the right times Have enough host-country knowledge to navigate area-specific nuances independently Will decrease the need for administrative resources by self-managing their relocations
February 11, 2025
Patricia Glasel has a rich international background, having lived in several different countries growing up. Her journey began in Gabon, where she was born, and extended across various African nations due to her father's work. Patricia's extensive experience as an expatriate has given her a deep understanding of the joys and challenges of living abroad. She holds M.B.A. an a degree in organizational behavior and cross-cultural training from Northwestern University, which has equipped her to support others in their global mobility journeys. After having lived in 11 countries, Patricia currently resides in France and enjoys sharing her experiences to help others navigate their expatriation adventures. Patricia also serves as a Foreign Trade Advisor for the French Government, providing high-level insights and support for international trade initiatives.
By Laurette Bennhold-Samaan February 3, 2025
In a competitive global market, organizations face a myriad of laws, regulations, and ethical standards. And because compliance requirements differ from one country to another, a workforce’s intercultural agility plays a significant part in a company’s ability to ‘be’ compliant in the countries they do business with. Intercultural misunderstandings can be costly, leading to safety issues, lost sales and missed business opportunities, but they can also result in hefty fines, sanctions, and even being barred from operating in key markets. Because the ability to navigate cultural differences is crucial to the success and sustainability of global organizations, cultural compliance should be a part of every organization’s overall compliance strategy. 
By Laurette Bennhold-Samaan January 20, 2025
“Leaders must acknowledge that increasing demographic diversity does not, by itself, increase effectiveness; what matters is how an organization harnesses diversity, and whether it’s willing to reshape its power structure.” - Harvard Business Review
A group of people are sitting around a table looking at a laptop computer.
By Patricia Glasel January 6, 2025
NetExpat recently interviewed two key members of the Eramet Group Team about their efforts in providing intercultural training for their international workforce through their partnership with NetExpat. The initiative is designed to enhance cultural understanding and collaboration among expatriates and multicultural teams, leading to better teamwork and productivity. The interview offers insights on the implementation, impact on performance, family integration success, and much more.
By Laurette Bennhold-Samaan December 16, 2024
Employee well-being benefits more than just employees. It also benefits employers and the customers they serve. What many organizations don’t realize is how much intercultural agility impacts employee well-being. Below, we’ll discuss the relationship between the two and why focusing on intercultural agility should always be a part of your global talent mobility strategy. Why Employee Well-being Matters Prioritizing employee well-being makes sense from a duty of care standpoint, but it also benefits businesses. Employees that are happy and well are typically more engaged at work. Employes that are culturally agile enjoy enhanced well-being, as they’re better able to collaborate with their teammates and customers. This results in higher levels of engagement at the individual level – and enhanced collaboration and innovation among teams. Additional outcomes include a stronger company culture, brand reputation, and employee retention rate. Customers also reap the benefits. When well-being is prioritized and employees are given the tools they need to succeed, they’re more likely to provide excellent customer service and care. Businesses benefit from higher customer satisfaction scores and brand loyalty. Conversely, the risks of not investing in employee well-being can be costly:
By Laurette Bennhold-Samaan November 20, 2024
When organizations support mobile employees during an intercultural assignment, they benefit long after those same individuals repatriate. The trouble is, too many businesses don’t see repatriation as a component of the assignment, which can have negative outcomes for both them and the employees they’ve invested in: Without repatriation support, employees face a myriad of challenges, from reverse culture shock and career uncertainty to feeling diminished. Businesses end up paying the price, from employees being disengaged to losing talent altogether. Both have negative impacts on a company’s ROI.
By Laurette Bennhold-Samaan November 8, 2024
Explore how cultural differences impact customer experiences and learn strategies for success in global business environments.
By Laurette Bennhold-Samaan October 29, 2024
In today’s rapidly evolving market, businesses have to adapt quickly to scale and stay competitive. At the heart of this challenge is a crucial function that supports all of that growth and adaptation: global talent mobility. More than just moving people from one point to another, effective relocation programs increase productivity, bolster talent acquisition and retention, drive business development, and result in market expansion and financial gains for an organization. So why do so many leaders still consider talent mobility to be an expense instead of a strategic investment? Below, we’ll discuss the importance of shifting perceptions, the long-term positive impacts relocations have on a business’ bottom line, and how internal mobility and HR/talent management teams can start building a business case for organizational leadership buy-in to invest in global talent mobility. Why Global Talent Mobility is a Strategic Investment Recent research from Localyze, which includes data from 240 European business leaders and managers across 4 countries, has revealed that global talent mobility benefits an organization’s bottom line in 10 areas: access to global talent, business profits, cultural awareness, knowledge sharing, innovation, employee retention, employee satisfaction, employee morale, faster hiring and DE&I. In addition, the expenses associated with relocations are far outweighed by an ROI gain of up to 270% when it comes to impact on productivity, talent retention, and overall profitability. In short, because of their daily exposure to mobile populations and associated relocation processes, talent mobility professionals play an integral role in achieving mobility objectives — but they’re also uniquely positioned to offer data-driven insights that can support and contribute to a company’s overarching goals and success. Talent Mobility: The gift that keeps on giving When it comes to innovation, competitiveness, and growth, a company’s success is directly tied to the development and engagement of its greatest asset: its employees. Global talent mobility accomplishes immediate goals by getting the right talent where a company needs it to be in the moment – but when used strategically, it also contributes to long-term gains. The following inter-related benefits should always be considered when calculating mobility’s true value to an organization:
Show More
Share by: